Companies

US Senator Eric Schmitt Drags India Visa Temple Into Scathing Attack on H-1B Programme Calling It a Global Visa Cartel That Disadvantages American Workers

Republican US Senator Eric Schmitt has launched a blistering attack on the H-1B visa programme, citing India's famous Chilkur Balaji Visa Temple as evidence of a global visa cartel that he claims systematically favours Indian nationals over American workers.
US Senator Eric Schmitt Drags India Visa Temple Into Scathing Attack on H-1B Programme Calling It a Global Visa Cartel That Disadvantages American Workers

Republican US Senator Eric Schmitt of Missouri has launched a blistering attack on the H-1B visa programme, describing it as part of a “global visa cartel” that systematically disadvantages American workers while disproportionately benefiting Indian nationals and large technology companies. In a lengthy and detailed thread posted on X (formerly Twitter) on 14 May 2026, Schmitt cited India’s famous Chilkur Balaji Temple — popularly known as the “Visa Temple” — as a cultural symbol of what he characterised as the gaming of the American immigration system by foreign workers and the networks that support them.

The senator’s intervention, which has gone viral both in the United States and India, represents a significant escalation of the political debate over the H-1B programme at a time when immigration, technology outsourcing and the future of American workforce competitiveness are among the most contentious issues in US domestic politics. It also arrives at a particularly sensitive moment for the estimated 800,000 Indian professionals currently working in the US on H-1B visas, many of whom have waited years or even decades for permanent residency.

What Schmitt Described as the “Visa Cartel”

In his X thread, Senator Schmitt outlined what he described as an interconnected system involving universities, outsourcing firms, recruiters and certain technology companies that, in his view, systematically favours foreign workers over Americans for high-skilled technology positions. “Big tech companies have laid off thousands of US workers while filling thousands of H-1B requests for identical roles,” Schmitt wrote. “82 per cent of those foreign hires came in below median wages. BILLIONS now flow to India for AI training instead, subsidised by Americans.”

He characterised this system as a “cartel” — a term that carries strong connotations of organised, systematic exploitation. “This is part of a global visa cartel. Networks recruit overseas, lie on résumés, file petitions, and treat workers like cattle,” the senator claimed, without providing specific evidence for the allegations of fraud. He did, however, cite data from the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) showing that Indian nationals receive the overwhelming majority of H-1B visas issued each year — approximately 72 per cent in FY2025 — and that a significant proportion of these are for positions at Indian IT outsourcing companies such as Infosys, Wipro and TCS.

The “Visa Temple” Reference

Perhaps the most culturally charged element of Schmitt’s critique was his reference to the Chilkur Balaji Temple, located near Hyderabad in Telangana. The temple, dedicated to Lord Balaji (a form of Lord Vishnu), has earned the nickname “Visa Temple” because of the widespread belief among devotees that praying at the temple helps secure US visa approvals. The Wall Street Journal featured the temple in a 2025 report, describing how devotees flock to the temple — particularly during the H-1B lottery season — to offer prayers and perform rituals in the hope of receiving visa approval.

Schmitt shared a photograph of the temple and wrote: “There’s literally a ‘Visa Temple’ in India where people pray for H-1B approvals. That’s how deeply embedded this system is in the culture. The H-1B isn’t a merit-based programme — it’s become an entitlement programme for a specific country.” The reference drew immediate backlash from Indian-American groups and religious organisations, who accused the senator of mocking Hindu religious practices and engaging in xenophobic stereotyping. “Millions of people pray at temples for all sorts of things — health, success, family well-being,” said Samir Kalra of the Hindu American Foundation. “To single out a temple and use it to characterise an entire visa programme as corrupt is offensive and intellectually dishonest.”

The H-1B Debate in Context

The H-1B visa programme, which allows US employers to temporarily hire foreign workers in specialty occupations, has been one of the most contentious elements of American immigration policy for decades. Supporters argue that it is essential for maintaining American competitiveness in technology, engineering, medicine and other fields where domestic talent supply is insufficient to meet demand. Critics, including Schmitt, argue that the programme has been captured by large corporations seeking cheaper labour, and that it depresses wages for American workers in the same fields.

The debate has intensified in 2026 following the Trump administration’s introduction of a $100,000 supplemental fee for H-1B applications — a measure that has raised hiring costs by approximately 30 per cent and disproportionately affects Indian IT workers. The fee was designed to discourage what the administration characterised as “frivolous” applications and encourage companies to hire domestically, but it has been criticised by the technology industry as a barrier to talent acquisition that will ultimately harm American innovation.

India’s Response and the Diplomatic Dimension

The Indian government has not officially responded to Senator Schmitt’s remarks, but Indian diplomatic sources in Washington expressed concern that the rhetoric could contribute to a hostile environment for Indian professionals in the US. India’s External Affairs Ministry has consistently maintained that Indian professionals contribute significantly to the US economy — generating innovation, creating jobs and paying billions of dollars in taxes — and that the H-1B programme serves the mutual interests of both countries.

The timing of Schmitt’s attack is also diplomatically significant, coming as the US and India are seeking to deepen their strategic partnership across defence, technology and economic cooperation. Any perception that Indian professionals are being unfairly targeted by American lawmakers could complicate these efforts and affect the broader bilateral relationship. Indian IT industry body NASSCOM responded to Schmitt’s thread by noting that “Indian IT professionals have been instrumental in building America’s technology infrastructure” and that “the H-1B programme operates within a rigorous legal framework that includes wage requirements, employer attestations and government oversight.”

What It Means for Indian Tech Workers

For the hundreds of thousands of Indian technology professionals working in the US on H-1B visas — and the millions more who aspire to do so — Senator Schmitt’s remarks are a sobering reminder of the political vulnerability of their status. The H-1B visa is a temporary, employer-sponsored visa that ties workers to their sponsoring company, limiting their ability to change jobs or negotiate better wages. Many Indian H-1B holders have been waiting in a massive green card backlog for over a decade, with some estimates suggesting that an Indian national applying for an employment-based green card today could wait 50 to 100 years under current per-country caps.

Immigration reform advocates have called for legislation to eliminate the per-country cap on green cards, which would dramatically reduce wait times for Indian and Chinese nationals. However, such reform has been stalled in Congress for years, and the current political environment — marked by rising populism and anti-immigration sentiment — makes passage unlikely in the near term. For Indian professionals caught in this system, the economic uncertainty created by rhetoric like Schmitt’s adds another layer of anxiety to an already precarious situation.

The “Visa Temple” controversy is likely to continue generating debate in both India and the US in the coming days, touching as it does on deeply held beliefs about meritocracy, cultural identity, immigration fairness and the role of technology companies in shaping the global labour market. For Senator Schmitt, the episode represents a political strategy targeting economic populism; for the Indian-American community, it is a reminder that even in the land of opportunity, their place remains contested and their contributions undervalued in certain political quarters.

Gaurav Thakur

Gaurav Thakur

Gaurav Thakur is an Editor at Daily Tips leading business and finance coverage. With sharp analytical skills and deep market knowledge, he covers India's economy, real estate, personal finance, and the startup ecosystem. His background in financial journalism and data-driven reporting ensures business content is both insightful and accessible.

View all posts by Gaurav Thakur →